Sunday, May 16, 2010

Sex Sex Sex





HVERNIG GERIRÐU KONUNA ÞÍNA HAMINGJUSAMA.
EINGÖNGU FYRIR KARLMENN

(HOW TO MAKE YOUR WOMAN HAPPY. ONLY FOR MEN)

Skemmtilegra kynlif - Fallegri samskipti - Meira sjálfsöryggi

Fun sex - A beautiful relationship - More confidence

This week at Nes Listamiðstöð Artist Residency we had a writer come to stay with us. Infamous amoung Icelanders, Þorgrímur Þráinsson is a sportsman turned writer. This is the book that rumours first surfaced about and we´ve managed to ´find´ one conveniently sticking half out of the studio´s bookshelf...it´s caused quite some interest over the last few days... though it´s stated ´Only for Men´, we´ve been doing a little research here at the studios of our own.

It seems that in fact pigs have orgasms that last up to almost an hour, women may draw it out for up to 51 seconds, and men, well much quicker than that.

But there are plenty of tips on how to please your woman, make her happy, understand male self-esteem and understand more about the connection between the sexes, and of course...sex sex sex! Just practice your Icelandic a bit before picking it up to read or have it read to you...

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Ben Frost Interview



Icelandic based and Melbourne raised modern composer, Ben Frost, resonates with universal theories of creativity in his interview with Resident Advisor. Some of the questions and answers here are concurrent with ideas I have within my own practice also. From audience reaction to my work, or ideas of process and what work should be or why I do it, some answers can be found in parallel to Frost's notions here.

A friend once told me that after listening to By the Throat for the first time, he felt sick. To play psychiatrist for a moment, how does that make you feel?

It's increasingly more difficult to get that kind of reaction from people, so I guess my immediate reaction is [that] it's a positive thing. For all our grandstanding about the heightened level of evolution we have apparently achieved, the idea that my music can invoke a physiological reaction in a person says a great deal about that illusion.

Why do you play in the dark?

In the same way, I don't want to make didactic albums, I also don't intend to perform didactically. That's one of the principal reasons I loathe the element of video in music performance. Telling your audience what your visual image your performance is supposed to evoke is frankly insulting to an audience. This postmodern obsession with turning every live concert into a cinematic experience is just fucking insulting to me as an audience

When you use video in a live show you are effectively saying to me two things. One: You are completely and utterly incapable of engaging me in your performance and are compensating. Two: You think I am a moron, and have no imagination of my own.

That said, I played at a festival the other night with Kanding Ray and he had "video"—but what was interesting about it is that there were no images, barely any colour. It was like a swarm of pixels that backlit his band and, occasionally but not always, made these synesthetic gestures of syncing with the beat—making very powerful kinetic relationships. There was no lighting and, as a result, it was lighting design rather than film. And I really, honestly loved it.

You obviously know (on some level) that there are images that are associated with your own ("earthquakes, volcanoes and fear of predators in dark") that most people already have in their minds when they approach your work. Does it bother you that potentially all people get is the dark stuff?

Contemporary music is going the way of the James Cameron school of storytelling: Remove any element of suggestion or subtlety and replace with a fucking sledgehammer. It's like: YOU. WILL. FEEL. THIS.

...I suggest things in my work, and my records certainly have an angle. I draw on everything that I absorbed while creating a record. They allude to images, texts, ideas, and I do try to frame what I've done...and obviously I see things in a particular way, which I can try to visualize on the cover of my record. I mean, it's my record, right?
...I think if you have strong ideas, there is no need to orchestrate the way in which they come together. The concept will reign.

I would like to think I respect the intelligence and—moreover—the imagination of an audience to draw the lines between things, dramatically. The void is far more fascinating than anything I could fill it with. I just want to map out my territory, and piss in the corners so you know where the edges are. You can work out—and make up the rest—on your own.
-Ben Frost 2010


The full interview can be found here:
http://www.residentadvisor.net/feature.aspx?1173

To purchase Ben Frost's work you can find it here:
http://www.bedroomcommunity.net/artists/ben_frost/
OR
http://www.room40.org/releases-frost.shtml

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

DIRECTIONS


^ Melody Woodnutt, 2010, "4 Titles."


Questions of pivots and paths.
My own musings are below after reading an interview with Marina Abramovic by Robert Ayers.


You believe that there’s a clear distinction between performance art and theatre?

"This is what I think: to be a performance artist, you have to hate theatre. Theatre is fake: there is a black box, you pay for a ticket, and you sit in the dark and see somebody playing somebody else’s life. The knife is not real, the blood is not real, and the emotions are not real. Performance is just the opposite: the knife is real, the blood is real, and the emotions are real. It’s a very different concept. It’s about true reality." - Marina Abramovic

Sometimes I find live art and performance art to be interchangeable words, however one rings more relevant to each individual performer/artist I guess. For performance art I find it more indicative of a "performance" with a "performer" and a "stage" and an "audience". For live art (wherein lies moreso an interest to myself) seems to transcend these boundaries of "performance" and bring into focus acts of art that may not need a stage, nor a "performer", despite the body's cooperation at times. Though, even recognising these differences, I still find it difficult to explain the difference to friends or other artists. But I am convinced that once you see them in front of you, you can tell the difference. Perhaps I am biased to a humility I find in works of live art, as opposed to a (possibly my mis-)conception that performance is louder, more egotistically based or "performed" in a more traditional sense than it's quieter younger brother. -Melody Woodnutt



"Now I’m 63 now, and I’m struck by the awareness that we can’t take anything with us. When we die the only thing we can leave is a good idea. Material goods are such an obsession of American culture especially. But it’s just illusion." - Marina Abramovic on her current show in NYC.

This is something I can highly relate to, the struggle within myself and the production of something for consumption. I work in hybrid arts. I am passionate about installation and experience. I construct ideas into physical things. In creating artworks or paintings or drawings or things...do we really need more stuff? Or do we in fact just need more ideas? I believe this is the pivotal notion that shifts me from producing paintings or drawings into creating non-material works, and moving further from the visual and more to the live realm. Someone once asked me "Mel if you burn all your art, who will be able to collect it?" I honestly don't think this should be a problem, so long as they have experienced something through it. ( I also would like to avoid burning art in the future, I'd like to go green....) Experiential work seems to me to be the only way forward. For us to experience art in our lives, in our venues, in our studios. Because ultimately, when we die, we have nothing but our memory, or less. - Melody Woodnutt





http://www.askyfilledwithshootingstars.com/wordpress/?p=1197
It is her 600-hour performance The Artist is Present, which will be a constant component of her MoMA retrospective of the same name, and which has been organized and curated by Klaus Biesenbach, It sees Ms Abramović cease all social interaction with the outside world, and all verbal contact, and dedicate herself instead – as she explains in this conversation – to an unbroken performing presence in the MoMA atrium.

Sunday, May 2, 2010




A Gate With No Fence.
A Skagaströnd house, further down Vetrarbraut, on the gravel road, towards the black beach, by the Icelandic horses. No borders, no boundaries, no obstacles. Just a gate, so you know you're almost there; where you should be. Now.